日本語 
Quantum computing has moved from a research contest into a strategic race over technology, security and industrial power. The US and China are pushing hard, while Japan is taking a different route. Its bet is not simply to build the largest quantum computer. It is to turn quantum research into an industrial capability that connects hardware, software, talent, manufacturing and real-world applications.
That shift matters because Japan already knows what happens when a country combines government coordination with industrial depth. Its semiconductor rise offers a useful historical reference. Now, Japan quantum computing strategy is trying to apply a similar logic to a technology that could reshape computing and cybersecurity. The result is a more securitized and commercially focused approach, where research is only the starting point and industrial deployment becomes the real test.
The Geopolitical Catalyst Behind Japan’s Quantum Push
For years, quantum computing lived mainly inside universities, laboratories and government research programs. That is changing quickly. The technology now sits at the intersection of economic competition, cybersecurity and national security.
The reason is straightforward. Powerful quantum computers could eventually break widely used public-key cryptography. That creates the risk of ‘Harvest Now, Decrypt Later’ attacks, where sensitive encrypted data is stolen today and stored until future quantum machines can decrypt it. For governments, financial institutions, defence organizations and critical infrastructure operators, that is not a distant science problem. It is a data sovereignty problem.
Japan’s policy direction reflects this change. Its Integrated Innovation Strategy 2026, approved on July 14, 2026, says geopolitical risks and intensifying international technology competition have made science, technology and innovation important elements of national security. More importantly, the strategy calls for an end-to-end approach covering basic research, human-resource development, social implementation and industrial competitiveness.
That last part is crucial to understanding Japan quantum computing strategy. Japan is trying to reduce the gap between invention and implementation. Instead of treating research, talent, industry and national security as separate policy boxes, the government wants them connected.
This also explains the growing role of economic security in Japanese technology policy. Quantum capability can influence encryption, communications, advanced manufacturing and future computing infrastructure. So, the country cannot afford to treat quantum as another long-term academic project.
The real challenge, however, is coordination. Japan’s own strategy recognizes vertical administrative silos and narrow self-reliance approaches as problems. That admission matters. Building quantum capability requires government ministries, universities, research institutions and companies to move in the same direction. Without that coordination, even strong research can remain trapped inside laboratories.
From Lab to Market with Japan’s Core Quantum Players
The most interesting part of Japan quantum computing strategy is becoming visible in the hardware itself. The country is no longer talking only about future possibilities. Japanese institutions are putting systems into operation, expanding access and testing commercial applications.
RIKEN Is Turning Quantum Hardware into Usable Infrastructure
On March 26, 2026, RIKEN and Osaka University launched 叡-II, a 144-qubit quantum computer, and began its quantum-computing cloud service. RIKEN says the new machine has more than twice the 64 qubits of the original system launched in 2023.
The bigger story is not the number alone. It is accessibility. Putting a quantum computer behind a cloud service starts changing its role from a laboratory asset into a computing resource that researchers and developers can actually use.
RIKEN is also building a quantum-HPC environment that connects quantum systems with classical high-performance computing. Its FY2026 work includes error mitigation, hybrid algorithms and applications in areas such as drug discovery, materials design and optimization.
That approach is important because commercial quantum computing will not arrive by simply replacing classical machines. For a long time, the more realistic model will be hybrid computing, where quantum and classical systems handle different parts of a problem.
Fujitsu Is Pushing Superconducting Systems Toward Scale
Fujitsu is taking another major step in Japan quantum computing strategy through superconducting hardware. The company is developing a 1,000-qubit superconducting quantum computer scheduled for installation and launch in 2026.
However, the more interesting development may be what Fujitsu is doing beyond the hardware itself. In March 2026, Fujitsu and the University of Osaka announced work on STAR Architecture Version 3 for early fault-tolerant quantum applications in drug discovery and new-material development.
The companies say the architecture reduced the number of qubits required for certain calculations to between 1/15 and 1/80 of conventional FTQC architectures.
That changes the commercial conversation. Quantum progress is not simply about adding more qubits. It is also about making useful calculations require fewer resources. If companies can reduce the hardware burden for practical workloads, commercial adoption becomes far more realistic.
Fujitsu is also testing quantum technology with real business workflows. In June 2026, it began joint research with Daiichi Life on asset management and asset allocation. This matters because commercial technology becomes credible only when businesses can test it against actual problems, data and evaluation criteria.
The Bigger Opportunity May Sit Below the Processor
Japan’s quantum opportunity should not be reduced to a race between hardware architectures. The country also has a potential advantage in industrial engineering, although claims of existing global dominance in quantum components would be premature.
Hitachi’s 2026 work points to the more defensible opportunity. The company is pursuing silicon quantum computing through semiconductor manufacturing processes, with work covering design, manufacturing, packaging, integration, control and operation.
That is a very Japanese way to approach the problem. Instead of asking only how to build a better laboratory prototype, the question becomes how to manufacture and integrate the technology at scale.
The Structural Bottlenecks Japan Cannot Ignore
The biggest risk to Japan quantum computing strategy is not a lack of ambition. It is execution.
Quantum computing requires highly specialized skills and infrastructure. Fujitsu’s 2026 collaboration with the Institute of Science Tokyo highlights the need for expertise across quantum hardware design, manufacturing, control and evaluation. It also points to infrastructure such as quantum-bit manufacturing facilities, large-scale cryocoolers and control devices.
That exposes a difficult talent problem. Japan needs people who understand physics, engineering, computer science and manufacturing at the same time. These skills do not appear overnight, and universities cannot produce them through conventional programs alone.
The brain-drain concern therefore deserves attention, but it should not be overstated without hard evidence. The more immediate issue is whether Japan can create enough attractive research and commercial opportunities to retain the people it develops.
There is also a bureaucratic challenge. Japan’s own innovation strategy acknowledges vertical administrative silos. Quantum technology cuts across ministries, research institutions and industries, so fragmented decision-making can slow funding, infrastructure deployment and commercial partnerships.
This is where the old Japanese model of ‘selection and concentration’ becomes tricky. Concentrating resources can accelerate progress when the right technology is selected. But quantum computing still involves competing architectures and uncertain commercial outcomes. Betting too narrowly too early could become a liability.
The Four Pillars That Could Make Japan’s Strategy Work
The first pillar is sustained funding. Japan has secured approximately ¥100 billion in supplementary-budget funding to accelerate next-generation quantum computer development and create a globally competitive quantum industry.
The significance goes beyond the amount. METI places quantum alongside AI, semiconductors, biotechnology, aviation and space, and energy and GX as strategic areas for capital investment and R&D. That signals that Japan quantum computing strategy is being treated as industrial policy, not merely research funding.
The second pillar is talent. Japan needs a quantum-native workforce that understands both the science and the industrial systems required to commercialize it. University partnerships with companies will matter because quantum hardware cannot be built through academic knowledge alone.
The third pillar is coordination. Japan needs something closer to a central command structure for quantum development. It does not necessarily have to copy DARPA, but the principle is useful. A strong coordinating body can connect funding, research priorities, infrastructure and commercial objectives instead of leaving each ministry to operate within its own silo.
The fourth pillar is industrial integration. Hitachi’s July 22, 2026 NEDO-backed project with Intel and AIST is a strong example. The project focuses on designing, manufacturing and integrating silicon qubit chips using semiconductor manufacturing processes. It includes industrial-quality 100-qubit technology and 3D integration for 1,000-qubit silicon quantum computers.
This is where Japan quantum computing strategy becomes genuinely interesting. The country’s historical strength was never just inventing components. It was building industrial systems around them. Quantum could reward that capability again.
Japan’s Quantum Bet Will Be Tested in Industry, Not Laboratories
Japan does not need to win the quantum race by spending more than every competitor or chasing the biggest processor headline. That would be a simplistic definition of victory.
The more credible opportunity is to build an ecosystem that makes quantum technology commercially useful. RIKEN is expanding access to quantum infrastructure. Fujitsu is pushing superconducting systems and practical applications. Hitachi is bringing semiconductor manufacturing logic into quantum hardware.
That is the real direction of Japan quantum computing strategy.
The next few years will reveal whether this coordination can survive the hard part, which is turning promising technology into repeatable industrial value. For investors, policymakers and technology leaders, the Japanese component and manufacturing market may therefore deserve as much attention as the quantum processors themselves. Japan’s advantage, if it materializes, may not be the machine everyone talks about. It may be the industrial system that helps make those machines usable.
English